“But What About…”
Sigmund Freud called religion an illusion humans invent to satisfy their security needs. To him, a benevolent, all-powerful God seemed incongruent with natural disasters and human evil.
God, though sovereign, gave us freedom to follow Him or to disobey Him. This response does not answer all concerns (because He sometimes does intervene to thwart evil) but suggests that the problem of evil is not as great an intellectual obstacle to belief as some imagine.
Pain’s emotional barrier to belief, however, remains formidable. Jesus understands suffering. He was scorned, beaten, and cruelly executed, carrying the guilt of our rebellion against God (Is. 53:10).
When I see God, items on my long list of questions for Him could include painful and unwanted divorces, betrayal by trusted coworkers, and all sorts of disappointing human behavior and natural disasters. Yet in Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection I have seen enough to trust him when he says he “causes all things to work together for good to those who love God” (Rom. 8:28).
2. What about all the contradictions in the Bible?
Often people don’t have specific examples, but rely on hearsay.
- Omission does not necessarily create contradiction. Luke, for example, writes of two angels at Jesus’ tomb after the Resurrection (24:1-9). Matthew mentions “an angel” (28:1-8). Is this a contradiction? If Matthew stated that only one angel was present, the accounts would be dissonant. As it stands, they can be harmonized.
- Differing accounts aren’t necessarily contradictory. Matthew and Luke, for example, differ in their accounts of Jesus’ birth. Luke records Joseph and Mary starting in Nazareth, traveling to Bethlehem (Jesus’ birthplace), and returning to Nazareth (Luke 1:26-2:40). Matthew starts with Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem, relates the family’s journey to Egypt to escape King Herod’s rage, and recounts their travel to Nazareth after Herod’s death (Matt. 1:18-2:23). The Gospels never claim to be exhaustive records. Biographers must be selective. The accounts seem complementary, not contradictory.
Space precludes more complex examples here. But time and again, supposed biblical problems fade in light of logic, history, and archaeology. The Bible’s track record under scrutiny argues for its trustworthiness.
3. What about those who never hear about Jesus?
God’s perfect love and justice far exceed our own. Whatever He decides will be loving and fair.
A friend once told me that many asking this question seek a personal loophole, a way so they won’t need to believe in Christ. C.S. Lewis in Mere Christianity wrote, “If you are worried about the people outside [of Christianity], the most unreasonable thing you can do is to remain outside yourself.”
If Christianity is true, the most logical behavior for someone concerned about those without Christ’s message would be to trust Christ and go tell them about Him.
4. How can Jesus be the only way to God?
Jesus’ claim is that “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me” (John 14:6).
The logic that draws me to this position involves three questions:
- If God exists, could there be only one way to reach Him? To be open-minded, I must admit this possibility.
- Why consider Jesus as a candidate for that possible one way? He claimed it. His plan of rescuing humans (“by grace … through faith … not … works,” Eph. 2:8-9) was distinct from those requiring works, as many other religions do. These two kinds of systems were mutually exclusive. Both could be false or either could be true, but both could not be true.
- Was Jesus’ plan true? Historical evidence for his resurrection, fulfilled prophecy and deity, and for the reliability of the New Testament, convinced me I could trust his words.
5. Isn’t Christianity just a psychological crutch?
Bob Prall has often said, “If Christianity is a psychological crutch, then Jesus Christ came because there was an epidemic of broken legs.” Christianity claims to meet real human needs such as those for forgiveness, love, identity, and self-acceptance. We might describe Jesus not as a crutch but an iron lung, essential for life itself.
Christian faith and its benefits can be described in psychological terms, but that does not negate its validity. Evidence supports Christianity’s truthfulness, so we would expect it to work in individual lives, as millions attest.
6. I could never take the blind leap of faith that believing in Christ requires.
We exercise faith every day. Few of us understand everything about electricity or aerodynamics, but we have evidence of their validity. Whenever we use electric lights or airplanes, we exercise faith—not blind faith, but faith based on evidence.
Christians act similarly. The evidence for Jesus is compelling, so one can trust him on that basis.
7. “It doesn’t matter what you believe as long as you’re sincere”.
After discussing this, a respected psychologist once said, “I guess a person could be sincere in what he believed, but be sincerely wrong.” In the 1960s, many women took the drug thalidomide sincerely believing it would ease their pregnancies—never suspecting it could cause severe birth defects.
Ultimately, faith is only as valid as its object. Jesus demonstrated by His life, death, and resurrection that he is a worthy object for faith.
You may be turned off because many Christians haven’t acted like Jesus. Maybe you’re angry at God because of personal illness, a broken relationship, a loved one’s death, or personal pain. Ask God for patience and respond to others in love as you follow Peter’s admonition: “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect” (1 Peter 3:15).